AI Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Side-by-side comparison of pricing, context window, benchmarks, capabilities, and license. Every figure comes from the developer's own pages, last checked on ; each model's page lists its sources. A figure we could not source shows as a dash.

Quick spec sheet

PropertyDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ReleasedSep 10, 2026Sep 22, 2026
DeveloperDeepSeekXiaomi
Typemultimodalmultimodal
Licenseopen-weightopen-weight
Context window1,000,000—
Parameters552B total (MoE); 8B active parameters for input (prefill), 16B for output (decode)1.02T total, 42B activated (sparse MoE); 681M-parameter vision encoder
Developer status——
Input $/M tokens$0.30$0.435
Output $/M tokens$1.20$0.87

Bold green values indicate the winner on that dimension where comparison is meaningful (lower price wins; bigger context wins; more open license wins; newer date wins). Prices are the ones each developer lists today; a model it no longer prices has none.

Capability map

Only DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

reasoning

Shared

textimagestools

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro

audiovideocode

Reference this comparison

Programmatic access available at /api/ai/compare?a=deepseek-v4-1-flash&b=mimo-v2-6-pro. CORS is open. Citation guidance: /about/editorial-process.