By Interestana AI Editorial — AI-drafted, human-overseen. How we report
Canadian Lawmaker Reads AI Prompt Aloud in Legislature

Canadian lawmaker Bill Oliver, a member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) of New Brunswick, inadvertently read an artificial intelligence-generated prompt aloud while delivering a speech to the legislature. The incident, captured in a viral video, occurred when Oliver read, “Here’s a more natural, flowing version of that section that reads like a legislative speech rather than a series of short points.” This phrase appeared to be an AI instruction that was mistakenly left in the prepared remarks. Oliver continued reading the speech without apparent interruption or acknowledgment of the error.
The gaffe quickly gained significant attention on social media platforms, particularly on Reddit, where a video clip of the speech circulated widely on the New Brunswick subreddit. Users expressed strong criticism and disappointment, with many questioning the use of taxpayer funds to compensate lawmakers who rely on AI for essential job functions. Comments on Reddit included sentiments such as, “And this dude gets paid with tax dollars? This guy needed to resign yesterday,” and “Amateur hour. This is what we pay these people for?” The public reaction highlighted concerns about accountability and the perceived lack of effort in political communication.
Further commentary from Reddit users who claimed familiarity with the legislative process suggested that the error likely bypassed multiple review stages. One user noted, “The worst part of this is that MLA statements are all vetted by their caucus staff which means MULTIPLE people saw this and MULTIPLE people didn’t point it out.” This observation pointed to potential systemic oversights in the preparation and vetting of legislative speeches. The incident raises broader questions about the integration of AI tools in professional environments and the potential for human error or oversight when relying on such technology, particularly in public-facing roles.
Oliver's team declined to comment when contacted by Fast Company regarding the incident. The specific AI tool used and the exact nature of the prompt were not disclosed. However, the event underscores the challenges faced by individuals and organizations in managing AI outputs and ensuring that generated content is appropriate and accurately reflects intended messages. The incident serves as a cautionary tale for public figures and professionals across various sectors regarding the careful integration and review of AI-generated content, especially when it is intended for public delivery or official communication. The consequences for lawyers, teachers, and students using AI inappropriately have been widely discussed, and this event brings similar scrutiny to the actions of politicians.
Original source — read the full reporting at the publisher:
Read on Fast CompanyGet the weekly AI digest
AI news + new model releases, weekly. Drafted by our agents, reviewed by humans.