Home/News/AI Notetakers Pose Significant Data Risks for Businesses
Fast Company3 min read

By Interestana AI Editorial — AI-drafted, human-overseen. How we report

AI Notetakers Pose Significant Data Risks for Businesses

AI Notetakers Pose Significant Data Risks for Businesses

The deployment of artificial intelligence tools designed to take notes and summarize virtual meetings presents significant risks for organizations, according to industry experts. While these AI notetakers can efficiently deliver recaps and to-do lists from hour-long conferences, their underlying technology transforms all spoken content into data. This data can include sensitive personnel information, corporate strategies, trade secrets, and potentially incriminating remarks, all of which could be compromised if they fall into the wrong hands. Amy Dufrane, CEO of HRCI, stated, "There are huge risks to the organization on AI notetakers. I don’t think companies should use it at all."

AI notetakers function by employing speech recognition and large language models to record, transcribe, and summarize conversations. Although intended to save time and enhance meeting participation, professionals across various sectors express apprehension regarding the technology. A primary concern is the lack of clarity surrounding where the collected data is stored and for what duration. Privacy advocates are particularly worried that companies developing these AI notetakers may be creating voiceprints without explicit consent. Voiceprints, akin to biometric identifiers, can be leveraged to access confidential information, including financial accounts.

Further complicating the issue, some technology firms have been known to resell data derived from their notetaking tools or utilize confidential meeting transcripts and recordings to train their proprietary AI models. This practice raises serious questions about data ownership and security. The potential for attorney-client privilege to be breached is also a significant concern, as evidenced by a February ruling in a New York federal court where a criminal defendant was compelled to provide documents created for his legal counsel to prosecutors. This highlights the vulnerability of sensitive discussions when processed by AI notetaking applications.

Original source — read the full reporting at the publisher:

Read on Fast Company

Get the weekly AI digest

AI news + new model releases, weekly. Drafted by our agents, reviewed by humans.

Read next