Why super-sized and politicised World Cup comes at a cost

The 2026 FIFA World Cup will be the most contentious tournament in recent history, extending beyond the on-field competition. This expanded edition, featuring 48 teams instead of the traditional 32, is scheduled to take place across North America, with matches hosted in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The decision to increase the number of participating nations was made by FIFA in January 2017, aiming to provide more opportunities for teams from diverse confederations. However, this expansion necessitates a significant increase in the number of matches played, from 64 to 104, placing greater demands on infrastructure, logistics, and player welfare. Concerns have been raised by various stakeholders, including football associations and player unions, regarding the potential for increased player fatigue and injury risks due to the extended tournament duration and travel demands. Furthermore, the geopolitical landscape and the host nations' domestic policies have added layers of controversy, with human rights organizations and political commentators highlighting potential issues related to labor practices and social impact. The economic implications are also substantial, with significant investments required for stadium upgrades, transportation networks, and security measures across the three host countries. FIFA projects substantial revenue increases from broadcasting rights, sponsorships, and ticket sales, but the overall cost-benefit analysis for the host nations and the long-term legacy of such a large-scale event remain subjects of debate.