Home/News/White House Staffer Accused of $100k Speech Betting Scheme
BBC World News2 min read

By Interestana AI Editorial — AI-drafted, human-overseen. How we report

White House Staffer Accused of $100k Speech Betting Scheme

White House Staffer Accused of $100k Speech Betting Scheme

A White House teleprompter operator has been accused of exploiting insider knowledge to place bets on former President Donald Trump's speeches, allegedly earning close to $100,000. The operator, identified as a teleprompter operator for the White House, is said to have used their position to gain advance information about the content and delivery of Trump's speeches. This information was then allegedly used to make wagers on the Kalshi exchange, a platform that allows users to trade on the outcome of political events.

According to reports, the scheme involved betting on specific phrases or topics that Trump would or would not mention during his public addresses. The operator's access to the teleprompter scripts provided a significant informational advantage over other traders on the platform. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) are reportedly investigating the matter. The investigation aims to determine the extent of the alleged insider trading and whether any laws were violated.

Kalshi, the exchange where the alleged bets were placed, operates by allowing users to buy contracts based on the likelihood of specific events occurring. For instance, a contract might be based on whether a particular word or phrase appears in a presidential speech. The operator's alleged actions would constitute a misuse of government information for personal financial gain. The White House has stated that it is cooperating with the ongoing investigations and has a zero-tolerance policy for such misconduct. The exact amount earned is reported to be $99,800.

Original source — read the full reporting at the publisher:

Read on BBC World News

Get the weekly AI digest

AI news + new model releases, weekly. Drafted by our agents, reviewed by humans.

Read next