Interestana
Home/News/Brands Create Crisis Responses for Government Propaganda Use
Fast Company4 min read

By Interestana AI Editorial — AI-drafted, human-overseen. How we report

Brands Create Crisis Responses for Government Propaganda Use

Companies are developing new crisis communication strategies to address the use of their intellectual property in U.S. government propaganda, a trend that has intensified during the Trump administration's second term. This necessity arose after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) incorporated the Transformers franchise into an AI-generated poster promoting a fictional film titled "Transformers: Age of Deportation." The poster depicted the iconic character Optimus Prime adorned with DHS logos, a move that prompted a swift response from toy company Hasbro. Hasbro issued a statement on Instagram explicitly disavowing the unauthorized use of its intellectual property and asserting that the values Optimus Prime represents, such as leadership and justice, are in conflict with the ideas conveyed by the DHS's propaganda. This incident highlights a growing concern for brands whose creations are being co-opted for political messaging without consent.

This situation mirrors a similar event that occurred just a week prior, involving the classic puzzle game Tetris. The White House had launched an online arcade featuring a game called "Build the Wall," which bore a resemblance to Tetris. The company behind Tetris responded with a statement nearly identical to Hasbro's, distancing its intellectual property from the White House's unlicensed creation. Furthermore, the Tetris company reiterated the core values of its game and explicitly threatened legal action. The White House subsequently removed the "Build the Wall" game from its website. These instances demonstrate a pattern of the U.S. government, particularly under the Trump administration, utilizing brands and copyrighted material in a manner that infringes upon intellectual property rights and prompts public disavowal from the affected companies.

The Trump administration has a documented history of using artists' music at campaign rallies and in advertisements without obtaining proper authorization. This precedent suggests a broader disregard for intellectual property and licensing agreements. The government's internet presence has increasingly adopted a style that has been described as a "sneering, copyright-agnostic meme-factory." This shift has compelled brands to proactively establish protocols for responding to such unauthorized uses of their content. The development of these crisis response mechanisms indicates a significant change in how corporations interact with government communications, moving from passive observation to active defense of their brands and values. The use of AI in generating propaganda, as seen with the "Transformers" example, adds another layer of complexity, as it allows for rapid creation and dissemination of potentially infringing content.

The implications of this trend extend beyond mere copyright infringement. It involves the potential dilution of brand identity and the misrepresentation of corporate values. When a brand's imagery is associated with political propaganda, it can alienate consumers and damage its reputation. Therefore, the proactive disavowal and legal threats issued by companies like Hasbro and the Tetris creators are crucial steps in safeguarding their intellectual property and maintaining brand integrity in an increasingly complex media landscape. The "Build the Wall" game's removal and Hasbro's strong statement underscore the pressure brands are willing to exert to protect themselves from being associated with controversial or unauthorized government messaging, forcing a new standard of corporate vigilance.

Original source — read the full reporting at the publisher:

Read on Fast Company

Get the weekly AI digest

AI news + new model releases, weekly. Drafted by our agents, reviewed by humans.

Read next