Judge Orders Michael Ovitz to Complete Deposition in Julia Ormond Lawsuit After Epstein Question Exit

A judge has mandated that Michael Ovitz, a prominent figure and co-founder of the powerful talent agency Creative Artists Agency (CAA), must complete his deposition in the ongoing sexual assault lawsuit brought forth by actress Julia Ormond. This judicial order follows Ovitz's abrupt departure from a previous deposition session, an exit triggered by questions concerning his past professional and personal associations with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender. Ormond's lawsuit alleges that CAA, through its actions in arranging a meeting for her with film producer Harvey Weinstein in December 1995, played a role in facilitating her subsequent alleged sexual assault by Weinstein. The core of Ormond's legal claim is that CAA, as her representative, breached its duty of care by connecting her with Weinstein, whom she contends was a known predator. The inclusion of questions about Jeffrey Epstein during Ovitz's deposition is significant. Epstein, who was convicted of sex trafficking and conspiracy, had a complex network of relationships within Hollywood and beyond, and questions about Ovitz's knowledge of or involvement with Epstein could be relevant to establishing a pattern of behavior or a broader understanding of the risks within the industry that CAA may have overlooked or enabled. Ovitz's refusal to answer these questions and his subsequent exit were deemed by the judge to be obstructive to the discovery process. The judge's ruling emphasizes the necessity of thorough examination of all potentially relevant information, including Ovitz's connections and awareness of individuals like Epstein, as it may shed light on CAA's alleged negligence or complicity in the events leading to Ormond's alleged assault. This case highlights the increasing legal scrutiny on talent agencies and other intermediaries in the entertainment industry regarding their responsibility for client safety and their vetting of individuals with whom they facilitate interactions. The outcome of Ovitz's completed deposition is anticipated to be a critical factor in determining the future course of Ormond's lawsuit against CAA, potentially influencing settlement negotiations or paving the way for a trial.