Interestana
Home/News/India Rejects Hague Court Ruling on Indus Waters Treaty
Al Jazeera4 min read

By Interestana AI Editorial — AI-drafted, human-overseen. How we report

India Rejects Hague Court Ruling on Indus Waters Treaty

India has rejected a ruling by a Hague-based arbitration court that affirmed the continued validity of the Indus Waters Treaty. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague issued an "arbitral award" on April 12, 2024, stating that the treaty, which governs the sharing of water from the Indus river system between India and Pakistan, remains in force. This decision came after India had challenged the legality of the proceedings initiated by Pakistan, arguing that the treaty itself prohibited arbitration on issues related to the treaty's interpretation and implementation. India's Ministry of External Affairs stated on April 15, 2024, that it "does not consider the present arbitration to be compatible with the IWT (Indus Waters Treaty) and has always said so." The Indian government's position is that the treaty's provisions, particularly Article IX, do not permit arbitration for disputes concerning the treaty's interpretation or application. India had previously argued that the PCA lacked jurisdiction to hear the case brought by Pakistan. The Indus Waters Treaty was signed in 1960 by India and Pakistan, brokered by the World Bank, and allocates the waters of six rivers: the Ravi, Beas, Sutlej, Jhelum, Chenab, and Indus. Under the treaty, India has unrestricted use of the three eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej), while Pakistan has unrestricted use of the three western rivers (Jhelum, Chenab, Indus). India is permitted to use western river waters for "run of the river" hydroelectric power generation and for limited agricultural use, but is restricted from diverting large amounts of water. Tensions over water resources are a recurring feature of India-Pakistan relations, with disputes often arising over the construction of dams and hydroelectric projects by India on rivers that flow into Pakistan. Pakistan has frequently accused India of violating the treaty by undertaking projects that it claims reduce the flow of water to Pakistan. The PCA's ruling is seen as a significant development in the ongoing water dispute, reinforcing the treaty's legal standing despite India's objections. The arbitration was initiated by Pakistan in 2016 after India had also initiated separate proceedings concerning the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects. India's rejection of the ruling signals a continued divergence in legal interpretations and a potential challenge to the treaty's future implementation, although the treaty itself remains technically in force according to the PCA. The Permanent Court of Arbitration is an intergovernmental organization established in 1899 to facilitate arbitration of international disputes between states, sovereign and private parties. Its rulings are intended to be binding on the parties involved.

Original source — read the full reporting at the publisher:

Read on Al Jazeera

Get the weekly AI digest

AI news + new model releases, weekly. Drafted by our agents, reviewed by humans.

Read next