Google can be directly liable for false AI Overview claims: German court

The Regional Court of Munich determined that AI-generated summaries constitute Google's own content, distinguishing them from traditional search results which are subject to different liability protections. The court issued a temporary injunction against Google, prohibiting the repetition of false claims that linked two Munich publishers to scams and questionable business practices.

The court's reasoning emphasized that AI Overviews actively rewrite, combine, and evaluate information "in its own words and according to its own structure," rather than merely directing users to external sources. Unlike traditional search results, which act as pointers to third-party content, the AI Overview was found to generate new, substantive statements that stood as complete answers, independent of the cited links.

Google's argument that existing case law for search engines and autocomplete should apply was rejected, as the court found the AI Overviews to be distinct in their creation and presentation of information. This ruling suggests that Google may face direct accountability for the accuracy of statements generated by its AI features, a departure from how liability for traditional search results is handled.