Former Pardon Attorney Sues DOJ Over Alleged Unlawful Firing

Former pardon attorney Elizabeth Oyer filed a lawsuit on Thursday against the U.S. Justice Department and Attorney General Todd Blanche, alleging her "unlawful" termination last year. Oyer claims she was fired after refusing to recommend the restoration of actor Mel Gibson's gun rights. The complaint, lodged in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, states that in early 2025, while serving as pardon attorney, Oyer was pressured to "disregard her duties and facilitate a political favor" for Gibson due to his alleged "relationship with President Trump." Oyer asserts that this request constituted a violation of her professional responsibilities and led to her dismissal. The lawsuit seeks damages for wrongful termination and other claims. The Department of Justice has not yet issued a public statement regarding the lawsuit. Todd Blanche, the current Attorney General, was appointed to his position in January 2025. Oyer's tenure as pardon attorney concluded in late 2025. The pardon attorney role within the Justice Department is responsible for reviewing applications for presidential pardons and commutations, and making recommendations to the President. This position requires a high degree of discretion and adherence to legal and ethical standards. The lawsuit highlights potential conflicts between political influence and the impartial administration of justice. Mel Gibson, an actor and director, has previously faced public scrutiny for controversial statements and actions. The specific nature of his relationship with President Trump, as alleged in the lawsuit, remains a key point of contention. The legal proceedings are expected to delve into the internal processes of the pardon attorney's office and the decision-making leading to Oyer's termination. This case could have implications for the independence of advisory roles within federal agencies and the potential for political interference in legal processes. The District of Columbia federal court will oversee the case, which could take an extended period to resolve. Oyer's legal team is expected to present evidence supporting her claims of wrongful dismissal and political coercion. The Justice Department's defense will likely focus on the standard procedures and justifications for employee terminations. The outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for future cases involving alleged political influence in federal employment decisions. The role of the pardon attorney is crucial in the clemency process, and any perceived compromise of its integrity could raise broader concerns about the fairness of the justice system. The lawsuit also brings attention to the transparency and accountability mechanisms within the Department of Justice. The specific details of the alleged pressure applied to Oyer, and the evidence of her refusal to comply, will be central to the legal arguments presented.