Interestana
Home/News/CNN, Politico, and MS NOW Sue Trump White House Over Press Credential Revocations
BBC World News3 min read

By Interestana AI Editorial — AI-drafted, human-overseen. How we report

CNN, Politico, and MS NOW Sue Trump White House Over Press Credential Revocations

CNN, Politico, and MS NOW Sue Trump White House Over Press Credential Revocations

On July 26, 2018, prominent American media organizations CNN, Politico, and MS NOW announced their intention to file a lawsuit against the Trump administration. The legal challenge was initiated to contest the revocation of White House press credentials for their journalists, a move the outlets argued infringes upon the fundamental principle that the government should not dictate which members of the press have access to report from the White House. This collective action followed the White House's decision on July 25, 2018, to permanently revoke the press pass of CNN correspondent Jim Acosta. The revocation occurred in the aftermath of a contentious press conference where Acosta engaged in a heated exchange with President Donald Trump. Subsequently, the ban was reportedly extended to encompass other journalists representing these specific news organizations.

The core objective of the lawsuit is to secure the restoration of White House access for the affected journalists. The media groups contend that the revocation of credentials constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which explicitly guarantees freedom of the press. They further argue that the White House's actions are retaliatory and arbitrary, lacking any clear justification or adherence to due process. The organizations emphasize that access to the White House is indispensable for effective reporting on the executive branch and for fulfilling their role in informing the American public. The precedent set by banning journalists from specific outlets is viewed as dangerous, potentially empowering the government to suppress critical reporting by controlling journalistic access.

Prior to the announcement of the lawsuit, then-White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders had defended the administration's decision. She characterized Acosta's conduct during the press conference as "outrageous," stating that while the President and his administration are open to difficult questions, they expect them to be asked in a "respectful manner." However, the media organizations involved dispute this characterization, asserting that Acosta was merely performing his journalistic duties. The lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment from the court, asserting that the revocation of credentials was unlawful, and an injunction to prevent the White House from implementing similar actions in the future. This legal battle underscores the ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and several news organizations, which the administration had frequently characterized with the pejorative term "fake news."

Original source — read the full reporting at the publisher:

Read on BBC World News

Get the weekly AI digest

AI news + new model releases, weekly. Drafted by our agents, reviewed by humans.

Read next