Home/News/Wisk Aero Faces Lawsuit Over Safety Concerns
TechCrunch2 min read

Wisk Aero Faces Lawsuit Over Safety Concerns

Wisk Aero, the Boeing-backed urban air mobility company, is facing a lawsuit from a former software manager who alleges he was wrongfully terminated after raising safety concerns. The manager, identified as Joshua Smith, claims he was fired in retaliation for flagging issues with the company's software development and testing processes. Smith's lawsuit, filed in a California court, asserts that Wisk rushed critical software testing ahead of a significant 2025 flight test for its autonomous air taxi.

According to the complaint, Smith expressed concerns that the company's software was not adequately tested to meet safety standards required for autonomous flight operations. He reportedly warned that the accelerated timeline put the project and public safety at risk. The lawsuit details that Smith was a key member of the software team and had been with Wisk Aero for several years before his termination in early 2024. His allegations include that Wisk Aero prioritized speed over thoroughness in its development cycle, potentially compromising the integrity of its autonomous flight system.

Wisk Aero, a joint venture between Boeing and the Kitty Hawk Corporation (which was previously backed by Google co-founder Larry Page), is developing an all-electric, vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. The company aims to deploy autonomous air taxis for urban transportation. The lawsuit highlights a potential conflict between the company's ambitious development schedule and the rigorous safety protocols necessary for aviation, particularly for autonomous systems.

Smith is seeking damages for wrongful termination and emotional distress. Wisk Aero has not yet filed a formal response to the lawsuit, and Boeing has declined to comment on the ongoing legal matter. The allegations raise questions about the internal safety culture and oversight within Wisk Aero as it progresses towards its 2025 flight test objectives. This legal challenge could impact the company's reputation and its ability to secure further investment and regulatory approval for its air taxi services.

Original source — read the full reporting at the publisher:

Read on TechCrunch

Read next