By Interestana AI Editorial — AI-drafted, human-overseen. How we report
Bank of Italy: Stablecoins Not Always Cheaper for Remittances

Research conducted by the Bank of Italy suggests that stablecoins do not consistently offer a cheaper alternative for remittance services compared to traditional methods. A mystery-shopping experiment, detailed in a Bank of Italy working paper, revealed that the overall cost of sending money using stablecoins can be similar to or even exceed that of conventional transfer services. This finding challenges the common perception that the decentralized nature and digital efficiency of stablecoins inherently translate to lower transaction costs for users.
The experiment simulated remittance transactions, focusing on the total cost incurred by the sender. The study identified several key factors contributing to the final expense. These include explicit exchange fees charged by platforms facilitating the conversion of fiat currency to stablecoins and vice versa, as well as foreign exchange spreads. These spreads represent the difference between the buying and selling price of currencies, a common source of cost in currency exchange. Furthermore, the study factored in the costs associated with the underlying banking rails and payment infrastructure required to move funds, even when utilizing blockchain technology.
These combined costs, when aggregated, often negate the potential savings that stablecoin proponents claim. The research highlights that while the blockchain transaction fee itself might be low, it is not the sole determinant of the overall remittance cost. The experiment's methodology involved comparing stablecoin-based transfers with traditional remittance services, such as those offered by established money transfer operators. The results indicated that in many simulated scenarios, the total outlay for stablecoin remittances was not significantly lower, and in some instances, was higher than traditional methods. This implies that the perceived advantage of stablecoins in terms of cost-effectiveness for remittances may be overstated or contingent on specific market conditions and platform implementations.
The Bank of Italy's findings underscore the complexity of the remittance market and the various hidden costs that can impact the final price for consumers. It suggests that regulatory bodies and consumers alike should look beyond the nominal transaction fees and consider the entire ecosystem of costs involved in stablecoin-based transfers. The research provides a data-driven perspective on the practical application of stablecoins for cross-border payments, indicating that further innovation and market maturation may be necessary for stablecoins to truly deliver on their promise of cheaper and more efficient remittances.
Original source — read the full reporting at the publisher:
Read on CoinDeskGet the weekly AI digest
AI news + new model releases, weekly. Drafted by our agents, reviewed by humans.