By Interestana AI Editorial — AI-drafted, human-overseen. How we report
Tech's Classroom Push Linked to Declining Student Scores

Neuroscientist and former teacher Jared Cooney Horvath has identified a correlation between the widespread implementation of classroom technology and a significant downturn in student academic performance, particularly in reading and math scores. Horvath's observations began with data from Utah's National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) tests for fourth- and eighth-graders, which showed a consistent decline after 2014. This inflection point, he noted, coincided with the introduction of the Student Assessment of Growth and Excellence (SAGE), Utah's first computer-adaptive testing system. The implementation of SAGE necessitated substantial investment in digital infrastructure within schools, shifting computers from peripheral tools to essential components for state assessments.
Horvath, who authored the forthcoming book "The Digital Delusion: How Classroom Technology Harms Our Kids’ Learning—and How to Help Them Thrive Again," posits that Utah's experience is not an isolated incident but rather part of a global trend. He testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation earlier this year, asserting that the impact of technology extends beyond mere test scores to fundamental cognitive capabilities. For the first time in modern history, Horvath stated, the current generation, often referred to as Gen Z, is failing to outperform their parents on standardized assessments, indicating a potential decline in cognitive capability compared to previous generations.
Further supporting his claims, Horvath cited data from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), which surveys 15-year-olds worldwide. This international data reveals not only a dip in test scores but also a direct correlation between increased screen time and poorer academic outcomes. The PISA findings suggest that the more time students spend in front of computers and tablets, the worse their scores tend to be. Horvath's central argument is that while technology was introduced into schools with the intention of enhancing learning, its pervasive use has, in fact, had an adverse impact on the learning process itself. He contends that the push for digital integration, often driven by technology companies, has overlooked potential negative consequences for student development and academic achievement. The shift towards digital learning environments, he suggests, may be inadvertently hindering the very cognitive skills that education aims to foster, leading to a generation that is less adept academically than its predecessors. This perspective challenges the prevailing narrative that increased technological integration in classrooms automatically leads to improved educational outcomes.
Original source — read the full reporting at the publisher:
Read on FortuneGet the weekly AI digest
AI news + new model releases, weekly. Drafted by our agents, reviewed by humans.